Allington, Daniel, Sarah Brouillette, and David Golumbia. 2016. “Neoliberal Tools (and Archives): A Political History of Digital Humanities.” Los Angeles Review of Books, May 1. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/neoliberal-tools-archives-political-history-digital-humanities/.
Anderson, Steve, and Laura McPherson. 2011. “Engaging Digital Scholarship: Thoughts on Evaluating Multimedia Scholarship.” Profession, 136–51. doi:10.1632/prof.2011.2011.1.123. http://www.mlajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1632/prof.2011.2011.1.123
Ayers, Edward L. 2013. “Does Digital Scholarship Have a Future?” EDUCAUSE Review 48 (4): 24-34. http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/8/does-digital-scholarship-have-a-future
Boyer, Ernest L. (1990) 2016. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Expanded Edition EBook. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Drucker, Johanna. 2014. Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Liu, Alan. 2004. “Transcendental Data: Toward a Cultural History and Aesthetics of the New Encoded Discourse.” Critical Inquiry 31 (1): 49–84. doi:10.1086/427302. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/427302
Pearce, Nick, Martin Weller, Eileen Scanlon, and Sam Kinsley. “Digital Scholarship Considered: How New Technologies Could Transform Academic Work.” In Education 16, no. 1 (2010). http://ineducation.couros.ca/index.php/ineducation/article/view/44.
Popovich, Nicholas G., and Steven R. Abel. 2002. “The Need for a Broadened Definition of Faculty Scholarship and Creativity.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education; Alexandria 66 (1): 59. https://search.proquest.com/docview/211263206?accountid=9784
Robertson, Stephen. 2016. “The Differences between Digital Humanities and Digital History.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, Digital. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/76.
Varis, Piia. 2016. “Digital Ethnography.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, edited by Alexandra Georgakopoulou and Tereza Spilioti, 55–68. https://books.google.com/books?id=7fQsCgAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&dq=routledge%20handbook%20of%20language%20and%20digital%20communication&pg=PT94#v=onepage&q&f=false
Weller, Martin. 2011. The Digital Scholar: How Technology Is Transforming Scholarly Practice. London: Bloomsbury.
Guidelines for Evaluating Digital Scholarship from Professional Organizations
“Draft – Resources for the Support and Evaluation of Digital Scholarship in Religious Studies.” 2016. Library Backroom Blog. November 7. http://library.iliff.edu/blog/draftingdigital.
“Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media.” (2000) 2012. Modern Language Association. https://www.mla.org/About-Us/Governance/Committees/Committee-Listings/Professional-Issues/Committee-on-Information-Technology/Guidelines-for-Evaluating-Work-in-Digital-Humanities-and-Digital-Media.
“Guidelines for the Evaluation of Digital Scholarship in Art and Architectural History.” 2016. College Art Association and the Society of Architectural Historians – Task Force to Develop Guidelines for Evaluating Digital Art and Architectural History for Promotion and Tenure. http://www.collegeart.org/pdf/evaluating-digital-scholarship-in-art-and-architectural-history.pdf.
“Guidelines for the Professional Evaluation of Digital Scholarship by Historians.” 2015. American Historical Association. https://www.historians.org/teaching-and-learning/digital-history-resources/evaluation-of-digital-scholarship-in-history/guidelines-for-the-professional-evaluation-of-digital-scholarship-by-historians.
Society for Visual Anthropology. (2001) 2015. “AAA Guidelines for Evaluation of Ethnographic Visual Media.” American Anthropological Association. http://www.americananthro.org/ConnectWithAAA/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1941.